more about search
Further research activities on this portal have been suspended due to shifting priorities within HPCR. Since the current database contains valuable information for practitioners, HPCR intends to keep this portal available in its current state.

Conference Report
Introduction
Background
Causes of Instability
Territorial Integrity
History
Political System
Society & Culture
Economic System
   Macroeconomics
   Foreign Investment
   Competition
   Livelihoods
   Recommendations
Role of NGOs
Recommendations
Appendices
Bahasa Version (pdf)
English Version (pdf)
Economic System: Foreign Investment
 
There is considerable disagreement about the importance of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the continuing economic development of Indonesia. Some analysts believe that FDI is not a significant driving force in the economy and that international financial markets are feverish and unreliable sources of economic guidance. These analysts argue that FDI contributes only 3-6% of total investment, employs only a small proportion of the labor force, and contributes little to technological improvements in the manufacturing sector. However, other analysts dispute the figures on which this argument relies, citing the fact that oil, gas, financial concerns and equipment loans are not accounted for in such calculations.

This latter opposing view notes that the countries that have done best in the world, in terms of human development indices as well as economic growth, are all major recipients of FDI. Simplified images of an Indonesia that would be happy if mischievous markets and intervening outsiders would just go away will not help to secure the safety and livelihood of local people or to resolve the existing conflicts.

While increases in FDI are not potentially destabilizing, indirect investments in shares and loans may be destabilizing if the demand for foreign exchange increases and a run on the banks ensues.

Many observers criticize the performance of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Indonesian economic affairs, pointing out that the IMF has been unrealistic in its demands. Indonesia has met demands to reduce subsidies on many goods but there may still be a negative response from those adversely affected. In the future, the Indonesian government may encounter problems agreeing to IMF terms; for example, disposing of state assets is likely to trigger opposition from the parliament. Despite the imperfect performance of the IMF, Indonesia needs to improve relations with the Fund in order to avoid souring the attitudes of foreign investors, bilateral donors and other international foreign institutions.

Recommendations:
  • The Indonesian business sector should continue to seek FDI. Efforts should be made to strengthen the capacity of Indonesian banks to withstand the vagaries of the international financial system.
  • The Indonesian government should attempt to improve its relationship with the IMF, meeting the Fund’s demands wherever possible, while implementing policies to mitigate any harsh effects on the Indonesian population.






Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research
Copyright © 2001 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College
HPCR Portals: Central Asia    Indonesia    Nepal    Economics and Conflict
www.preventconflict.org/portal/main/portalhome.php
www.hsph.harvard.edu/hpcr/cpi/cpi.htm

HPCR is not responsible for the content of external publications and Internet sites linked on this portal.